# Top 10 2017-A4-Broken Access Control

From OWASP

==The Top 10-2017 Wiki is under Construction. The Content is Not Finished yet.==
==Edits to this page will be lost. If you wish a change, please file an issue on GitHub. ==

← A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) | 2017 Table of Contents 2017 Top 10 List | A5-Security Misconfiguration →

Threat Agents | Attack Vectors | Security Weakness | Technical Impacts | Business Impacts
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Application Specific | Exploitability EASY | Prevalence WIDESPREAD | Detectability EASY | Impact MODERATE | Application / Business Specific
Consider the types of authorized users of your system. Are users restricted to certain functions and data? Are unauthenticated users allowed access to any functionality or data? | Attackers, who are authorized users, simply change a parameter value to another resource they aren’t authorized for. Is access to this functionality or data granted? | For data, applications and APIs frequently use the actual name or key of an object when generating web pages. For functions, URLs and function names are frequently easy to guess. Applications and APIs don’t always verify the user is authorized for the target resource. This results in an access control flaw. Testers can easily manipulate parameters to detect such flaws. Code analysis quickly shows whether authorization is correct. | Such flaws can compromise all the functionality or data that is accessible. Unless references are unpredictable, or access control is enforced, data and functionality can be stolen, or abused. | Consider the business value of the exposed data and functionality. Also consider the business impact of public exposure of the vulnerability.

Am I Vulnerable To 'Broken Access Control'? The best way to find out if an application is vulnerable to access control vulnerabilities is to verify that all data and function references have appropriate defenses. To determine if you are vulnerable, consider: For data references, does the application ensure the user is authorized by using a reference map or access control check to ensure the user is authorized for that data? For non-public function requests, does the application ensure the user is authenticated, and has the required roles or privileges to use that function? Code review of the application can verify whether these controls are implemented correctly and are present everywhere they are required. Manual testing is also effective for identifying access control flaws. Automated tools typically do not look for such flaws because they cannot recognize what requires protection or what is safe or unsafe. | How Do I Prevent 'Broken Access Control'? Preventing access control flaws requires selecting an approach for protecting each function and each type of data (e.g., object number, filename). Check access. Each use of a direct reference from an untrusted source must include an access control check to ensure the user is authorized for the requested resource. Use per user or session indirect object references. This coding pattern prevents attackers from directly targeting unauthorized resources. For example, instead of using the resource’s database key, a drop down list of six resources authorized for the current user could use the numbers 1 to 6 to indicate which value the user selected. OWASP’s ESAPI includes both sequential and random access reference maps that developers can use to eliminate direct object references. Automated verification. Leverage automation to verify proper authorization deployment. This is often custom.
Example Attack Scenarios Scenario #1: The application uses unverified data in a SQL call that is accessing account information: pstmt.setString(1, request.getParameter("acct")); ResultSet results = pstmt.executeQuery( ); An attacker simply modifies the ‘acct’ parameter in the browser to send whatever account number they want. If not properly verified, the attacker can access any user’s account. http://example.com/app/accountInfo?acct=notmyacct Scenario #2: An attacker simply force browses to target URLs. Admin rights are also required for access to the admin page. http://example.com/app/getappInfo http://example.com/app/admin_getappInfo If an unauthenticated user can access either page, it’s a flaw. If a non-admin can access the admin page, this is also a flaw. | References OWASP OWASP Top 10-2007 on Insecure Direct Object References OWASP Top 10-2007 on Function Level Access Control ESAPI Access Reference Map API ESAPI Access Control API (See isAuthorizedForData(), isAuthorizedForFile(), isAuthorizedForFunction() ) For additional access control requirements, see the ASVS requirements area for Access Control (V4). External CWE Entry 285 on Improper Access Control (Authorization) CWE Entry 639 on Insecure Direct Object References CWE Entry 22 on Path Traversal (an example of a Direct Object Reference weakness)

← A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) | 2017 Table of Contents 2017 Top 10 List | A5-Security Misconfiguration →

© 2002-2017 OWASP Foundation This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Some rights reserved.
Retrieved from "https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Top_10_2017-A4-Broken_Access_Control&oldid=229054"
Categories:

- OWASP Top Ten Project
- OWASP Top Ten 2017 Project